Why Some Indicators Lead and Others Lag — and What That Means

Play Leading vs. Lagging Indicators →

Why an Indicator Leads

Why an Indicator Lags

Lagging indicators are not useless. Because they confirm what has happened, they are the natural check on a leading signal that may have been noise.

What the Three Composite Indexes Contain

How the Classification Is Used — and Misused

The honest way to describe these indicators is as a summary of historical timing regularities, not as a forecasting machine. A leading index turns down before recessions have started in the past, but it has also turned down without a recession following, and the lead time has varied widely from cycle to cycle — which means the signal cannot be read as a schedule. Composites exist precisely because single series are noisy, and analysts conventionally look for a decline that is sustained over several months, meaningful in size, and broad across components before treating it as significant. It also matters that indicators are revised: the numbers available in real time are not the numbers that appear in the history books, which is one reason the NBER's Business Cycle Dating Committee waits for revised data and typically announces turning points long after they occurred. The classification is a way of organizing evidence about where the economy has been, not a way of knowing where it is going.